Call (877) 781-1888

Home / South Carolina / Is South Carolina a comparative fault state?

Is South Carolina a comparative fault state?

Yes. South Carolina follows modified comparative negligence: a person whose negligence is not greater than the defendant's can recover damages reduced in proportion to their own share. The court's own words, a 2026 change to joint liability, and percentage examples.

Call me back

Free, and no is a fine answer.

Short answer: South Carolina is not a no-fault state. The Code says "There is no personal injury protection (PIP) coverage mandated under the automobile insurance laws of this State," [4] and the Supreme Court allows recovery when a plaintiff's negligence is "not greater than that of the defendant." [1]

Case law and statutes read on November 9, 2026. General information, not legal advice. Fault is decided by the facts of each case; only an attorney can tell you how the rule applies to yours.

The rule in the court's words

In Nelson v. Concrete Supply Co., the South Carolina Supreme Court wrote:

For all causes of action arising on or after July 1, 1991, [1] a plaintiff in a negligence action may recover damages if his or her negligence is not greater than that of the defendant. The amount of the plaintiffs recovery shall be reduced in proportion to the amount of his or her negligence. If there is more than one defendant, the plaintiffs negligence shall be compared to the combined negligence of all defendants.

The court explained that, in adopting this rule, it joined "the vast majority of our sister jurisdictions" [1] saying "Having determined comparative negligence is the more equitable doctrine, we now join the vast majority of our sister jurisdictions" [1] and it replaced the older all-or-nothing rule of contributory negligence that the court had upheld since Freer v. Cameron (1851).

The words "not greater than" [1] matter. On our reading of those words, a plaintiff who is exactly 50% at fault is not "greater," so the rule does not bar recovery at 50% and bars it above 50%. This is a plain reading of the quoted words, and a licensed South Carolina attorney can confirm how courts apply the 50% line.

What changed in 1991

Before Nelson After Nelson
Rule Contributory negligence: any fault by the injured person could bar recovery Modified comparative negligence
A person 10% at fault Barred Can recover, reduced by 10%
A person 50% at fault Barred Can recover, reduced by 50% (negligence "not greater than" [1] the defendant's)
A person 51% at fault Barred Barred
Who decides the percentages n/a The jury or the judge, after hearing the evidence

How the percentages work (illustrations, not predictions)

These examples use percentages only. They show the arithmetic of the rule and say nothing about what any real case is worth.

Example Injured person's share Other side's share What the rule does
A 0% 100% No reduction
B 20% 80% Damages are reduced by 20%
C 40% 60% Damages are reduced by 40%
D 50% 50% The injured person's negligence is not greater than the defendant's, so damages are reduced by 50%
E 51% 49% The injured person's negligence is greater than the defendant's, so the rule bars recovery
F 60% 40% Barred
G (two other drivers) 40% 30% and 30% The court compares 40% with the combined 60%, so the injured person can recover, reduced by 40%

Example G reflects the sentence in Nelson: "If there is more than one defendant, the plaintiffs negligence shall be compared to the combined negligence of all defendants." [1]

When more than one person is at fault: joint and several liability

A separate South Carolina statute, S.C. Code Ann. § 15-38-15, decides who pays when more than one party caused the same indivisible harm. It says that joint and several liability "does not apply to any defendant whose conduct is determined to be less than fifty percent of the total fault for the indivisible damages," [2] and that such a defendant "shall only be liable for that percentage of the indivisible damages determined by the jury or trier of fact." [2] Percentages are compared against "the total of" all fault including the plaintiff's own.

Two details matter for 2026:

  • The statute was amended for claims arising after January 1, 2026. The Code page now prints the amended § 15-38-15, with a history note for 2025 Act No. 42 effective January 1, 2026. It refers to "defendants and tortfeasors" [2] and adds rules for putting a nondefendant on the verdict form, including that the tortfeasor "must be disclosed within one hundred eighty days of the commencement of the action or at a later time for good cause shown." [2] The act that made the change (2025 Act No. 42, H.3430) says it "applies only to causes of action or claims arising or accruing after January 1, 2026." [3]
  • Exceptions. The amended subsection (F) lists "wilful, wanton, reckless, or intentional or conduct involving the illegal or illicit use, sale, or possession of drugs" [2]: a defendant in those categories is jointly and severally liable. Claims that arose before 2026 are governed by the earlier version, which we do not quote because the live Code page no longer prints it.

Which version applies to a particular crash, and what it means for a particular case, is a question for an attorney.

What "fault" means in practice

Fault is a finding about what each person did. Things that often come up in a crash: speed, following distance, lane changes, phone use, a missed signal or sign, and whether a driver was impaired. Statements at the scene, the officer's report, photos and witness accounts can all play a part. The percentages are not set by the police report. See how to get a Columbia crash report.

Government vehicles

A different statute, the South Carolina Tort Claims Act, applies to claims against state agencies and local governments. The contribution act that contains § 15-38-15 says in § 15-38-65 that it "shall not apply to governmental entities." [2] Ask an attorney how fault is handled in a claim like that.

What only an attorney can tell you

We cannot tell you your share of fault, whether you can recover, or how the 2026 amendment affects you. If an insurer says you were partly or mostly at fault, that is the kind of statement to ask an attorney about before you answer.

Sources

Page last updated November 9, 2026. Attorney review pending. General information, not legal advice. Fees, hours and rules change; confirm on the official page. How we source.

Questions

Is South Carolina a no-fault state?

No. Section 38-77-144 says "There is no personal injury protection (PIP) coverage mandated under the automobile insurance laws of this State." [4] An injured person makes a claim against the driver at fault, and may recover if their own negligence "is not greater than that of the defendant." [1]

Is South Carolina a pure comparative fault state?

No. It is "modified": a plaintiff whose negligence is greater than the defendant's cannot recover. The Supreme Court wrote that a plaintiff "may recover damages if his or her negligence is not greater than that of the defendant" [1] (Nelson v. Concrete Supply Co., 1991).

What is the South Carolina fault bar, 50% or 51%?

The court's wording is that a plaintiff "may recover damages if his or her negligence is not greater than that of the defendant." [1] On those words recovery is allowed at exactly 50% and barred at 51% or more. This is a plain reading of the quoted words, and a licensed South Carolina attorney can confirm how courts apply the 50% line.

Does being partly at fault reduce my damages?

Yes. "The amount of the plaintiffs recovery shall be reduced in proportion to the amount of his or her negligence." [1]

What if more than one driver caused the crash?

The court wrote that "If there is more than one defendant, the plaintiffs negligence shall be compared to the combined negligence of all defendants." [1] Section 15-38-15 governs how responsibility is divided among defendants; see the page above.

Did anything change in 2026?

Section 15-38-15 was rewritten effective January 1, 2026 for claims arising or accruing after that date: the act says it "applies only to causes of action or claims arising or accruing after January 1, 2026." [3] Ask an attorney how it applies.

Questions before you decide? Asking is free.